17 Feb 2024 4:57 am
I think what they're saying is probably correct - as it's in keeping with what they've been saying about their evidence all along. The data-sets are colossal. There's no reason not to provide them, since they had them. But there is a reason the court simply can't process them in to a coherent picture - that being, that the data-sets are colossalBidencrimefamily » 17 Feb 2024, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑ No they say they did. And the governor of Georgia says they admitted they did not have any.
That makes sense - what doesn't make sense is that a group would go to this much effort knowing they had no evidence and knowing that they were pursuing their own massive fail when someone asked them for the evidence. That doesn't make any sense, and so it probably wasn't what happened
No, I'm not raking through history to 'provide links'. If you can't directly dispute a point, then question your own links.